The MVS and WVS are prepared from either the MCB or WCB, depending on the
preference of the manufacturer. Some manufacturers derive an inoculum from WVS
to manage seed capacity. Viral seeds are also tested to document consistency of the
biological product across passages.
4.2.2.3
Technology Evolution
Several factors have shaped the evolution of cell-culture technology.
Viral safety associated with the selection of a cell line is a key element that will
be discussed extensively in the next paragraph (see Section 4.3). In association with
this topic, the raw materials required to prepare cell banks contribute to the safety of
the cell line. This will also be reviewed.
The yield and cost-efficiency of the upstream processes are key aspects for
consideration in the manufacture of vaccines, especially as many vaccines are re-
commended for universal or mass vaccination programs. To develop cost-efficient
upstream processes, certain cells, including CHO and many continuous cell lines,
have been developed or selected to be amenable for suspension (non-adherent)
culturing. The shift to suspension allows high-cell density culturing and hence high
yields. By contrast, some cell lines, such as MRC-5 and Vero cells, are adherent in
culture, and hence usually display low to medium yields. For the manufacture of
live-attenuated vaccines, a low virus yield may not be an issue because the content
of a vaccine dose is low. For inactivated viral vaccines and recombinant products,
high yields and hence high cell-culture densities are preferred.
To achieve high cell-culture densities, bioreactors are preferred over stationary
technologies, such as cell factories. Several bioreactor technologies have been de-
veloped. Since 2000, the technologies have evolved from stainless-steel bioreactors to
disposable bioreactors. Disposable bioreactors provide agility to GMP operations and
can contribute to cost efficiency. Disposable bioreactors are also useful for estab-
lishing cell banks. The bioreactor technologies will be further discussed in Chapter 6.
4.3
VIRAL SAFETY
The risk of virus contamination in a manufacturing facility is low, but when it
occurs, the impact is severe [8]. In a recent review published by the Consortium on
Adventitious Agent Contamination in BioManufacturing (CAACB), 26 virus con-
taminations were reported over the past 36 years [9].
4.3.1
RISK AND IMPACTS
The risks resulting from a viral contamination can be positioned at different levels:
•
Risk to vaccine recipients from direct inoculation (safety risk when pa-
thogenic for human)
• Risk to product quality
• Risk to other products in the facility
• Risk to product availability for vaccine recipients
Cell lines for vaccine production
63